Observational data in faculty development: An underused method
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Teaching and Learning in Medicine
- Vol. 4 (2) , 103-109
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339209539542
Abstract
Direct observation in clinical settings ("in the field") as a method of evaluation has been mentioned infrequently in the medical education literature. This article presents a case study of the use of qualitative field observations for the purposes of both needs assessment and formative evaluation in the implementation of a Faculty Development Program in a Department of Family Practice. The observations were repeated after a 2‐year period, permitting comparison. The results of the observations, and how they were used in the evolution of the Faculty Development Program, are discussed, as are the value and cost of this form of data collection.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Do House Officers Spend Their Nights?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Covering-Over and Over-Reflecting During Residency Training: Using Personal and Professional Development Groups to Integrate Dysfunctional Modes of BeingPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Organizational rascals in medical education: Midlevel innovation through faculty developmentTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 1989
- Data Discrepancies and Their OriginsEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1985
- Research Approaches in Health Professions EducationEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1981
- Original Research: Programme Evaluation: An Anthropological Look at the ClerkshipMedical Teacher, 1980