Scientific Racism: The Cloak of Objectivity
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 47 (3) , 101-115
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01825.x
Abstract
This article reviews an application of sociobiological perspectives on “racial” differences, focusing on the work of J. P. Rushton. Rushton has concluded that, as a result of evolutionary processes, the three major “racial” groups may be hierarchically ranked such that Mongoloids > Caucasoids > Negroids. The assumptions and evidence presumably supportive of Rushton's sociobiological perspective are reviewed and critiqued. The concept of “race” is politically defined; the Darwinian arguments are teleological; theoretical constructs are flawed; and the empirical data bases are frequently misrepresented. This area of research is discussed in terms of the ideological underpinnings of social science inquiry, and the goals and functions of scholarship in contemporary society.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Causes and Cures of CriminalityPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Curriculum design for Black (African American) psychology.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1988
- Factoring intelligence: A longitudinal approachBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1987
- RETRACTED: An Evolutionary Theory of Health, Longevity, and Personality: Sociobiology and r/K Reproductive StrategiesPsychological Reports, 1987
- Leapfrog over the brainBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1987
- Saving sociobiology: The use and abuse of logicBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1987
- The problem of adaptation in the study of human behaviorEthology and Sociobiology, 1987
- The Japanese-American: A cross-cultural, cross-sectional study of sex guiltJournal of Research in Personality, 1982
- Racism and International RelationsAlternatives: Global, Local, Political, 1977
- How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic AchievementHarvard Educational Review, 1969