Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures?

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Integrated Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
• Are Health Technology Assessments a reliable tool in the analysis of the clinical value of PET in oncology? Who audits the auditors?
  European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2003
• The value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-?-glucose positron emission tomography in the selection of patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer for combined modality treatment
  Lung Cancer, 2003
• Practice, efficacy and cost of staging suspected non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in two Dutch hospitals
  Thorax, 2002
• Preoperative Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Positron-Emission Tomography
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
• Discussion
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
• Evidence-based diagnostic radiology
  The Lancet, 1997
• Investigation for mediastinal disease in patients with apparently operable lung cancer
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
• Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designs
  The British Journal of Radiology, 1987
• Randomized Clinical Trials
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1976