Fault coverage and yield predictions: do we need more than 100% coverage?
- 31 December 2002
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TEST SETS ON QUALITY LEVEL PREDICTION: WHEN IS 80% BETTER THAN 90%?Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2005
- An experimental study on reject ratio prediction for VLSI circuits: Kokomo revisitedPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- Functional and scan tests: The effectiveness of I/sub DDQ/ how many fault coverages do we need?Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1992
- On yield, fault distributions, and clustering of particlesIBM Journal of Research and Development, 1986
- The effects of wafer to wafer defect density variations on integrated circuit defect and fault distributionsIBM Journal of Research and Development, 1985
- Characterizing the LSI Yield Equation from Wafer Test DataIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 1984
- Defect Level as a Function of Fault CoverageIEEE Transactions on Computers, 1981
- Forecasting reject rate of tested LSI chipsIEEE Electron Device Letters, 1981
- LSI Product Quality and Fault CoveragePublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1981
- On a composite model to the IC yield problemIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1975