Reliability of colonoscopy
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 32 (12) , 1023-1025
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02553873
Abstract
In an effort to determine the reliability of colonoscopy the authors retrospectively reviewed preoperative colonoscopic findings and compared them with the postoperative pathologic specimen reports. Only lesions greater than 0.5 cm were included in the comparison. Over a 13-year period, 429 patients with colorectal cancer underwent preoperative colonoscopy. Four hundred thirteen (97 percent) of the colonoscopic examinations correlated with the pathologic specimen, but, in 16 cases (3 percent), lesions were missed. In total, 17 adenomatous polyps and 3 cancers were found in the surgical specimens that were not documented at colonoscopy. Eighteen patients had total preopecative colonoscopy and total abdominal colectomy, which makes for a reliable model to judge the accuracy of colonoscopy. In these 18 patients, 17 of the pathologic specimens correlated with the endoscopic findings, which yields an accuracy rate of 94 percent. Blind areas in the colon, plus misjudgment that the scope had reached the cecum, are responsible for the majority of colonoscopic errorsKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- ColonoscopyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1982
- Double-contrast barium-enema examination and endoscopy in the detection of polypoid lesions in the cecum and ascending colon.Radiology, 1982
- A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colonAbdominal Radiology, 1977
- A hard look at colonoscopyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Evaluation of the colonoscopic examinationDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1975
- Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal diseaseThe American Journal of Surgery, 1975