Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study
Open Access
- 1 June 2001
- Vol. 85 (6) , 672-679
- https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.85.6.672
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness derived by an expert panel on hypothetical patients are associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and subsequent revascularisation in the ACRE (appropriateness of coronary revascularisation) study. DESIGN Population based, prospective study. The ACRE expert panel rated hypothetical clinical indications as inappropriate, uncertain, or appropriate before recruitment of a cohort of real patients. SETTING Royal Hospitals Trust, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS 3631 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography (no exclusion criteria). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Angiographic findings, mortality (n = 226 deaths), and revascularisation (n = 1556 procedures) over 2.5 years of follow up. RESULTS The indications for coronary angiography were rated appropriate in 2253 (62%) patients. 166 (5%) coronary angiograms were performed for indications rated inappropriate, largely for asymptomatic or atypical chest pain presentations. The remaining 1212 (33%) angiograms were rated uncertain, of which 47% were in patients with mild angina and no exercise ECG or in patients with unstable angina controlled by inpatient management. Three vessel disease was more likely among appropriate cases and normal coronaries were more likely among inappropriate cases (p < 0.001). Mortality and revascularisation rates were highest among patients with an appropriate indication, intermediate in those with an uncertain indication, and lowest in the inappropriate group (log rank p = 0.018 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION The ACRE ratings of appropriateness for angiography predicted angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rates. These findings support the clinical usefulness of expert panel methods in defining criteria for performing coronary angiography.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Underuse of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients Considered Appropriate Candidates for RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Waiting for coronary angiography: is there a clinically ordered queue?The Lancet, 2000
- Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE studyJournal of Public Health, 1999
- ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and InterventionsPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Audit of coronary angiography and bypass surgeryThe Lancet, 1990
- The Appropriateness of Using a Medical ProcedureMedical Care, 1987
- Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983
- Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.Circulation, 1976
- Prognostic significance of coronary arteriography.1970