Assessment of obesity beyond body mass index to determine benefit of treatment
- 1 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Obesity
- Vol. 1 (2-3) , 77-84
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00017.x
Abstract
What is already known about this subject • Weight or weight loss per se may not indicate health status or health benefit. • There is no gold standard for assessing which patients would benefit most from weight-loss interventions. • The King's Criteria is one of several recently proposed obesity classification systems. What this study adds • The King's Criteria can capture health problems related to obesity and health benefits after weight loss. • The King's Criteria is a reproducible scoring system. • Using the King's Criteria may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians from weight loss to health gain. Summary Body mass index (BMI) alone does not reflect health status in individuals. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria is a clinical tool for the assessment of patients with complex obesity. We assessed the performance of a modified version of the King's Criteria by scoring 144 obese patients before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. We also evaluated inter-observer variability by having 11 clinicians score the same 12 patients. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria comprise nine health domains: Airways, Body mass index, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Economic complications, Functional limitations, Gonadal axis, Health status (perceived), and body Image. For each domain, a person's health is assigned a score of 0 (‘normal health’), 1 (‘at risk’), 2 (‘established disease’) or 3 (‘advanced disease’). The patient's mean BMI decreased from 48 ± 7 to 37 ± 7 kg m−2 post surgery. Before surgery, 84% of patients were either in stage 2 (‘established disease’) or stage 3 (‘advanced disease’) for one or more domains other than BMI. The modified King's Criteria showed significant health improvements after surgery, with a higher proportion of patients scored in stage 0 (‘normal health’) within each health domain (P < 0.001 for all). Observers assigned the same score in >75% of cases for all domains except Health status perceived (71%) and body Image (65%). In conclusion the King's Criteria captured morbidity in obese patients and health gains after weight loss. Different clinicians mostly assigned similar scores. The King's Criteria is a clinical tool that may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians towards improving health and not only losing weight. Registration number: NCT01112228 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Techniques, assessment, and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in combating obesityOpen Access Surgery, 2010
- Morbidly Obese Patients—Who Undergoes Bariatric Surgery?Obesity Surgery, 2010
- How Do We Define Cure of Diabetes?Diabetes Care, 2009
- The relationship between overweight and obesity, and sick leave: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Obesity, 2009
- Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studiesThe Lancet, 2009
- Weight Loss to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Overweight and Obese WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Obesity as a Disease: A White Paper on Evidence and Arguments Commissioned by the Council of The Obesity SocietyObesity, 2008
- Emerging Concepts in the Medical and Surgical Treatment of ObesityPublished by S. Karger AG ,2008
- Body-Mass Index and Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux in WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Psychosocial functioning in the obese before and after weight reduction: construct validity and responsiveness of the Obesity-related Problems scaleInternational Journal of Obesity, 2003