Cranial remodeling to treat craniosynostosis by gradual distraction with a new device
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 96 (4) , 654-659
- https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.96.4.0654
Abstract
Object. The authors describe their experience in remodeling the shape of the cranium in children with craniosynostosis by using gradual distraction. In half of the cases, a new distraction device developed by the authors was used. Methods. Twenty children with craniosynostosis underwent frontoorbital advancement and cranial remodeling assisted by gradual distraction. There were five children with brachycephaly, two with oxycephaly, five with scaphocephaly, two with plagiocephaly, one with combined scaphocephaly and plagiocephaly, and five with trigonocephaly. Four cases were syndromic and 16 were nonsyndromic. The patients ranged in age from 3 to 50 months (mean 14.5 months) at the first surgery. Simulated surgery was first performed on a three-dimensional solid model made of polyurethane, which accurately represented cranial flexibility, to determine the most favorable osteotomy line. Distraction was initiated 1 week postoperatively. The speed and extent of advancement (maximum extension 45 mm) were predetermined on the basis of previously reported criteria and the results of simulated surgery. Postoperatively, the cranial configuration was favorable in all cases. Spontaneous remodeling of irregularities and/or gaps apparent after distraction was found to occur 2 to 5 months after removal of the distraction devices, especially in patients with trigonocephaly or scaphocephaly. No major perioperative complication was observed in any patient. There were minor complications in six of the first 10 cases, including exposure of the device, shaft slippage, and fluid discharge. A new device was developed and used on the last 10 patients treated; it successfully eliminated device exposure and shaft slippage. A 3-year follow-up review confirmed that there was no relapse of advanced bones. Conclusions. Highly satisfactory results were achieved in cases of both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis when gradual distraction was performed.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distraction Osteogenesis of the Craniofacial SkeletonPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001
- Cranial Vault Expansion: A Comparison of Magnetic Coupled Distraction to Traditional Surgical RepositioningPediatric Neurosurgery, 2000
- Midface surgery from Tessier to distractionChild's Nervous System, 1999
- Monobloc and Facial Bipartition Distraction with Internal DevicesThe Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 1999
- Frontoorbital advancement by gradual distractionJournal of Neurosurgery, 1998
- SPRING MEDIATED DYNAMIC CRANIOFACIAL RESHAPING: Case reportScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 1998
- Twenty-Year Experience with Early Surgery for CraniosynostosisPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and faciocraniosynostosis: a 20-year experienceBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1994
- Lengthening the Human Mandible by Gradual DistractionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992
- The growth patterns of normal skull by using CT scans and their clinical applications for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in craniofacial surgeryEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1991