The problem of therapeutic equivalence with paired qualitative data: An example from a clinical trial using haemophiliacs with an inhibitor to factor VIII
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 10 (3) , 433-441
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100315
Abstract
The problem of demonstrating the equivalence of two treatments or drugs occurs fairly frequently in medicine, but is quite often misformulated. The common error is to assume equivalence is demonstrated if the usual null hypothesis of no difference is not rejected, which ignores the potential of a substantial β‐error. We describe here two procedures for testing equivalence when the data are paired and dichotomous, and provide sample size formulas. We give an example based on a clinical trial of haemophiliacs with inhibitor to Factor VIII.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- Sample size and power for pair‐matched case‐control studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Proplex® vs. proplex® SX: A controlled double blind study of the effectiveness in treating acute hemarthroses in hemophilia a patients with inhibitors to factor VIIIThrombosis Research, 1986
- Note on interval estimation of the difference between proportions from correlated seriesStatistics in Medicine, 1985
- Factors determining steric course of enzymic glycosylation reactions: glycosyl transfer products formed from 2,6-anhydro-1-deoxy-D-gluco-hept-1-enitol by .alpha.-glucosidases and an inverting exo-.alpha.-glucanaseBiochemistry, 1982
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- Efficacy of Prothrombin-Complex Concentrates in Hemophiliacs with Antibodies to Factor VIIINew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Number of observations required for the comparison of two correlated proportionsCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 1980
- Hospital Discharge One Week after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- 283. Note: On McNemar's Test for the 2 × 2 Table and Its Power FunctionPublished by JSTOR ,1970