Facilitated PCI in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 22 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (21) , 2205-2217
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0706816
Abstract
We hypothesized that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) preceded by early treatment with abciximab plus half-dose reteplase (combination-facilitated PCI) or with abciximab alone (abciximab-facilitated PCI) would improve outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, as compared with abciximab administered immediately before the procedure (primary PCI). In this international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who presented 6 hours or less after the onset of symptoms to receive combination-facilitated PCI, abciximab-facilitated PCI, or primary PCI. All patients received unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin before PCI and a 12-hour infusion of abciximab after PCI. The primary end point was the composite of death from all causes, ventricular fibrillation occurring more than 48 hours after randomization, cardiogenic shock, and congestive heart failure during the first 90 days after randomization. A total of 2452 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group. Significantly more patients had early ST-segment resolution with combination-facilitated PCI (43.9%) than with abciximab-facilitated PCI (33.1%) or primary PCI (31.0%; P=0.01 and P=0.003, respectively). The primary end point occurred in 9.8%, 10.5%, and 10.7% of the patients in the combination-facilitated PCI group, abciximab-facilitated PCI group, and primary-PCI group, respectively (P=0.55); 90-day mortality rates were 5.2%, 5.5%, and 4.5%, respectively (P=0.49). Neither facilitation of PCI with reteplase plus abciximab nor facilitation with abciximab alone significantly improved the clinical outcomes, as compared with abciximab given at the time of PCI, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00046228.)Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Coronary Angioplasty with Fibrinolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial—PRAGUE-2European Heart Journal, 2003
- Extended Mortality Benefit of Early Postinfarction ReperfusionCirculation, 1998
- Intercenter variability in outcome for patients treated with direct coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1998
- Primary Coronary Angioplasty versus ThrombolysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Coronary Angioplasty with Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Link Between the Angiographic Substudy and Mortality Outcomes in a Large Randomized Trial of Myocardial ReperfusionCirculation, 1995
- A Comparison of Immediate Coronary Angioplasty with Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993