Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation?
- 5 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 36 (2) , 237-247
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00226-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring Divergence Between Respondent and Researcher Definitions of the Good in Contingent Valuation StudiesJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1999
- Valuation of tropical rainforests: philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuationEcological Economics, 1998
- Focus GroupsAnnual Review of Sociology, 1996
- WELFARE LOSS OF WETLANDS DISINTEGRATION: A LOUISIANA STUDYContemporary Economic Policy, 1996
- MEASURING NON‐USE VALUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS USING THE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD: PROBLEMS OF INFORMATION AND COGNITION AND THE APPLICATION OF COGNITIVE QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN METHODSJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1995
- Boys' Thoughts and Talk about Sex in a Working Class Locality of GlasgowSociological Review, 1994
- An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation StudiesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994
- Valuing Environmental Functions: Tropical WetlandsLand Economics, 1994
- Valuation and management of wetland ecosystemsEcological Economics, 1989
- The Use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: The Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and QualityJournal of Marketing Research, 1982