Team heterogeneity and its relationship with team support and team effectiveness
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Educational Administration
- Vol. 40 (1) , 44-66
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210415643
Abstract
Explores the origins of school‐staff team effectiveness by focusing on team characteristics, especially on team heterogeneity and team support. Based on educational and organizational theory, we derived propositions about how heterogeneity may affect team support and team effectiveness. More specifically, we hypothesized that task‐related attributes of heterogeneity (functional, educational, and team tenure) would relate positively to team support and team effectiveness, whereas relations‐related attributes would relate negatively to team support and team effectiveness. With a sample of 48 teams, identified as intact work teams, we found results partially confirming our propositions. Specifically, high heterogeneous teams in gender and functions were more supportive and effective than low heterogeneous teams in those attributes. By contrast, high heterogeneous teams in tenure were less supportive and effective than low heterogeneous teams in that attribute. The results are discussed in light of the specific context of schools, and several theoretical and managerial implications are drawn.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing TeamsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE: ONCE MORE INTO THE BREECHPersonnel Psychology, 1997
- The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowermentJournal of Educational Administration, 1997
- The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive MovesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1996
- Problem‐solving Teams and the Improvement of Organizational Performance in SchoolsSchool Organisation, 1994
- The performance impact of strategy ‐ manager coalignment: An empirical examinationStrategic Management Journal, 1991
- Boundaries Around Group Interaction: A Meta-Analytic Integration of the Effects of Group SizeThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1991
- Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal, 1989
- Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- Organizational Demography and Turnover in Top-Management GroupAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1984