An assessment of methods for measuring volumes of planktonic bacteria, with particular reference to television image analysis
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Bacteriology
- Vol. 58 (1) , 105-112
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb01435.x
Abstract
Several methods for measuring volumes of planktonic bacteria were compared. The eyepiece micrometer grossly overestimated cell width (47–65%) and hence volume (73%). Shrinkage occurred with scanning electron microscopy, so volumes were underestimated by about 77%. All the other methods gave similar results (mean volume = 0.133 µm3). The optimum technique was to filter acridine orange stained bacteria through polycarbonate membrane filters (0.2 µm) which were photographed with epifluorescence microscopy using Kodak Tri‐X pan film. We recommend that volumes are estimated from individual area and perimeter measurements of at least 200 bacteria with a Quantimet 800 or Q10 image analyzer.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biomass and production of phyto‐ and bacterio‐plankton in eutrophic Lake Tystrup, DenmarkFreshwater Biology, 1983
- Comparison between direct methods for determination of microbial cell volume: electron microscopy and electronic particle sizingApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1983
- The transport of bacteria in the sediments of a temperate marshEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 1983
- Microcomputer-Assisted Biomass Determination of Plankton Bacteria on Scanning Electron MicrographsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1981
- Influence of Method on the Apparent Size Distribution of Bacterioplankton Cells: Epifluorescence Microscopy Compared to Scanning Electron MicroscopyMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1981
- Microscopical Image Analysis: Problems And Approaches*Journal of Microscopy, 1979
- Direct Epifluorescence Enumeration of Native Aquatic Bacteria: Uses, Limitations, and Comparative AccuracyPublished by ASTM International ,1979