Continuing education in the Australian university: a critique of contract‐based curriculum development

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The paper critically examines the principal assumptions underlying a contract‐based approach to curriculum development ('contractualism') in university continuing education. Contractualism draws its inspiration from economic rationalist ideology, which emphasises effectiveness and efficiency, and presupposes a model of persons as atomistic, autonomous, egoistic, deracinated, mechanistically rational maximisers of their own, essentially material, interests. The following assumptions of contractualism are questioned: the efficacy of education as a private commodity; the efficacy of enlightened self‐interest; the individmlistic view of humamity; the sufficiency of educational functionalism; the specifiability of educational outcomes; client awareness of their best interests; client understanding of the procedural alternatives; the progressiveness of the framework; its essentially empowering nature; the complementarity of extra‐university programs; and that of open learning programs. To theextent that these assumptions fail in theways identified in the critique, the quality of contractualist curricula may be diminished through: curricular simplification, fragmentation, inflexibility and orthodoxy; conceptual situationalism; procedural inflexibility; heightened inequality; and individualistic functionalism. It is suggested that contractualism may be both insufficient and inappropriate as an approach to curriculum development in this context.

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit: