Comment on "Magnetic transistor behavior explained by modulation of emitter injection, not carrier deflection"
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Electron Device Letters
- Vol. 3 (12) , 394-395
- https://doi.org/10.1109/EDL.1982.25611
Abstract
In order to investigate the influence of emitter crowding on the sensitvity, we fabricated a batch of devices that were completely similar to those reported by V. Zieren and B.P.M. Duyndam [1982], except for one thing. The base diffusion was omitted, resulting in a device with a top contact and a pair of two buried bottom contacts. In fact we are now dealing with a three-terminal resistor. The device shows a magnetic sensitivity which is very much comparable to that of the transistor sensor. Since any junction is absent and since the device is operated in a constant current mode and both output terminals are kept at equal voltages, the magnetic sensitivity cannot possibly be the result of a "modulation of emitter injection level" as was stated by Vinal and Masnari [ibid., Lett., EDL-3, no. 8, pp. 203-205. Aug. 1982]. Furthermore, it must be clear that in our transistor device the collector region - with a thickness of 9μm - is of more importance for deflection than the 0.6μm-thin base layer although the latter was suggested by Vinal and Masnari.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic transistor behavior explained by modulation of emitter injection, not carrier deflectionIEEE Electron Device Letters, 1982
- Magnetic-field-sensitive multicollector n-p-n transistorsIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1982
- Differential amplification magnetic sensorIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1972
- Concentrating Holes and Electrons by Magnetic FieldsPhysical Review B, 1949