Organized Factions and Disorganized Parties
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Party Politics
- Vol. 7 (2) , 235-256
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007002005
Abstract
This paper extends the study of party organization and legislative voting to factionalized party systems. After developing a typology of factional types, it argues that hierarchically organized factions respond to a competing incentive system. Factions have interests that push them to work together for the good of the party, but at the same time they have interests in distinguishing themselves for electoral purposes. Further, the electoral cycle drives the weights of these competing pressures, leading factional cooperation to break down as elections near. These patterns and incentives are particularly evident in Uruguay, and the paper uses roll call data from that country's legislature to test the propositions.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan's Liberal Democratic PartyBritish Journal of Political Science, 1999
- Uruguay's constitutional referendum 8 December 1996Electoral Studies, 1997
- As a Matter of Factions: The Budgetary Implications of Shifting Factional Control in Japan's LDPLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1997
- 1996 Vote: The “No Majority” Realignment ContinuesPolitical Science Quarterly, 1997
- The Electoral Fortunes of Legislative Factions in JapanAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative IndexAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- “Effective” Number of PartiesComparative Political Studies, 1979
- Parties, Factions and Tendencies in BritainPolitical Studies, 1964
- Party Factions and Comparative Politics: Some Preliminary ObservationsMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1960
- The Electoral System in UruguayThe Journal of Politics, 1955