Structure‐activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential of diacrylates and dimethacrylates
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 17 (5) , 281-289
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01478.x
Abstract
Apparently conflicting guinea pig sensitisation data on diacrylates and dimethacrylates published by 3 groups of authors, are analysed in terms of the RAJ model. This model, correlating sesitisation score with a combination of induction dose, chemical reactivity and lipophilicity, enables the major discrepancies to be rationalised. The data provide a striking example of the overload effect, in that some of the diacrylates have failed to show sensitisation when tested at high induction doses, but are revealed as strong sensitisers when tested by other authors at lower induction doses.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The derivation of quantitative correlations between skin sensitisation and physio-chemical parameters for alkylating agents, and their application to experimental data for sultonesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Induction of formaldehyde contact sensitivity: dose response relationship in the guinea pig maximization testActa Dermato-Venereologica, 1985
- Epicutaneous induction of tolerance with acrylates and related compoundsContact Dermatitis, 1985
- The sensitizing capacity of multifunctional acrylates in the guinea pigContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Sensitizing potential of 12di(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig*Contact Dermatitis, 1983
- IRRITATION AND ALLERGY TO ACRYLATES AND METHACRYLATES .2. POLYFUNCTIONAL ACRYLIC-MONOMERS1981
- Contact dermatitis from acrylic compoundsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1977
- Partition coefficients and their usesChemical Reviews, 1971