The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected Returns
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 61 (1) , 259-299
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
Abstract
We examine the pricing of aggregate volatility risk in the cross‐section of stock returns. Consistent with theory, we find that stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns. Stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility relative to the Fama and French (1993, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 2349) model have abysmally low average returns. This phenomenon cannot be explained by exposure to aggregate volatility risk. Size, book‐to‐market, momentum, and liquidity effects cannot account for either the low average returns earned by stocks with high exposure to systematic volatility risk or for the low average returns of stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really Matter?The Journal of Finance, 2005
- Information in the Idiosyncratic Volatility of Small FirmsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- The dynamics of stochastic volatility: evidence from underlying and options marketsJournal of Econometrics, 2003
- Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic RiskThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing TestsThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage, and the Profitability of Momentum StrategiesThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- The Conditional CAPM and the Cross‐Section of Expected ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Expected stock returns and volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 1987
- The Role of Conditioning Information in Deducing Testable Restrictions Implied by Dynamic Asset Pricing ModelsEconometrica, 1987
- Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: A RevisitJournal of Political Economy, 1986