A Dose of Our Own Medicine: Alternative Medicine, Conventional Medicine, and the Standards of Science
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 31 (2) , 222-235
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00083.x
Abstract
The discussion about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is sometimes rather heated. “Quackery!” the cry goes. A large proportion “of unconventional practices entail theories that are patently unscientific.” “It is time for the scientific community to stop giving alternative medicine a free ride. There cannot be two kinds of medicine — conventional and alternative. There is only medicine that has been adequately tested and medicine that has not, medicine that works and medicine that may or may not work.” “I submit that if these treatments cannot withstand the test of empirical research, … then we have wasted a lot of time and effort. The time has been wasted on all the people who have spent years learning falsehoods about acupuncture points and the principles of homeopathy. And the patients have wasted their time, money, and efforts receiving treatments that were not what they were represented to be or were harmful.”Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risks and Benefits of Activated Protein C Treatment for Severe SepsisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Are selective COX 2 inhibitors superior to traditional non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?BMJ, 2002
- Keeping Quality On The Policy AgendaHealth Affairs, 2001
- Perspective: Medicare Pharmacy Coverage: Ensuring Safety Before FundingHealth Affairs, 2000
- How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?The Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Is Health Care Ready for Six Sigma Quality?The Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Insurance Coverage for Experimental TechnologiesHealth Affairs, 1995
- Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Why Unconventional Medicine?New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Which Rate Is Right?New England Journal of Medicine, 1986