Keeping Quality On The Policy Agenda
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 20 (3) , 82-90
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.82
Abstract
Quality of care in the United States and elsewhere consistently fails to meet established standards. These failures subject patients to premature death and needless suffering. Yet, unlike the experience with other threats to life (tire failures or airplane rudders), public and private policymakers have been unable to maintain sufficient interest in identifying and solving problems with quality to change the way in which care is delivered. We discuss why it is hard to keep quality on the policy agenda and suggest short-term steps that are necessary if quality is to improve here and in the rest of the world.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Public Versus The World Health Organization On Health System PerformanceHealth Affairs, 2001
- Quality of Medical Care Delivered to Medicare BeneficiariesJAMA, 2000
- Impact of Disseminating Quality Improvement Programs for Depression in Managed Primary CareJAMA, 2000
- Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization proceduresAmerican Heart Journal, 2000
- Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in SwedenHeart, 1999
- How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?The Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication ErrorsJAMA, 1998
- Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- Chance, Continuity, and Change in Hospital Mortality RatesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993