A Theory of Bank Regulation and Management Compensation
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 13 (1) , 95-125
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13.1.95
Abstract
We show that concentrating bank regulation on bank capital ratios may be ineffective in controlling risk taking. We propose, instead, a more direct mechanism of influencing bank risk-taking incentives, in which the FDIC insurance premium scheme incorporates incentive features of top-management compensation. With this scheme, we show that bank owners choose an optimal management compensation structure that induces first-best value-maximizing investment choices by a bank's management. We explicitly characterize the parameters of the optimal management compensation structure and the fairly priced FDIC insurance premium in the presence of a single or multiple sources of agency problems.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management turnover and financial distressPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Investment incentives, debt, and warrantsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- The impact of contingent liability on commercial bank risk takingJournal of Financial Economics, 1998
- Regulatory distortion of management compensation: The case of golden parachutes for bank managersJournal of Banking & Finance, 1997
- CEO Compensation in Financially Distressed Firms: An Empirical AnalysisThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Is Fairly Priced Deposit Insurance Possible?The Journal of Finance, 1992
- Capital Structure and Dividend Irrelevance with Asymmetric InformationThe Review of Financial Studies, 1991
- Capital regulation and insured banks choice of individual loan default risksJournal of Monetary Economics, 1989
- Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect informationJournal of Economic Theory, 1979