The Attitudes of English and Australian College Students toward Institutional Authority
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 122 (1) , 41-48
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1984.9713454
Abstract
It is argued that “authoritarianism” and “attitude to authority” should be differentiated, and that measures based upon the latter concept hold greater promise of success in investigating differences between cultures. It was confirmed that Ray's Directiveness Scale, a valid measure of one aspect of authoritarianism, is uncorrelated with a general measure of attitudes toward institutional authority (the GAIAS). Further, unlike the Directiveness Scale, that measure provided evidence of cross-cultural differences between college students in England (N = 100) and Australia (N = 100). English students were significantly more pro-authority.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Behavioral Validity of Some Recent Measures of AuthoritarianismThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- A concise scale for the assessment of attitudes towards institutional authorityAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1982
- Attitudes Toward Authority and Authoritarian Personality CharacteristicsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1982
- Authoritarianism in California 30 Years Later—With Some Cross-Cultural ComparisonsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1980
- The Authoritarianism of White South AfricansThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1980
- Racism and Authoritarianism among White South AfricansThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1980
- Authoritarianism in Australia, England, and ScotlandThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1979
- The Generality of Attitude to AuthorityHuman Relations, 1979
- Does authoritarianism of personality go with conservatism?Australian Journal of Psychology, 1979
- Measuring Preferences for Hierarchical Control: An Attitude Scale for Contemporary TimesPsychological Reports, 1975