The Logic of Party Alignments
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Theoretical Politics
- Vol. 3 (1) , 65-80
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003001005
Abstract
This paper presents a theoretical framework for analyzing change in party alignments that highlights their underlying logic and dynamic evolution. The framework is based on three analytical concepts - opportunity, motive and means. The opportunity for partisan change increases as party alignments age because aging alignments include a growing proportion of incompletely socialized and weakly aligned citizens. Motive is ever-present because of losing, but rational-calculating politicians need to dislodge the current majority and institute one of their own. And the means of partisan change are provided by powerful new issues that can split the majority party's fragile coalition. It is the dynamic interaction among these three elements that leads to the natural evolution of party alignments.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unrealized Partisanship: A Theory of DealignmentThe Journal of Politics, 1987
- Partisan Change and Dealignment in Canada, Great Britain, and the United StatesComparative Politics, 1985
- Are Western Party Systems “Frozen”?Comparative Political Studies, 1984
- REALIGNMENT BEGINS?American Politics Quarterly, 1982
- Realignment: The Eternal QuestionPs, 1982
- The 1928–1936 Partisan Realignment: The Case for the Conversion HypothesisAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- Issue Coalitions, Issueless Campaigns: the Paradox of Rationality in American Presidential ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 1981
- On the Study of Party RealignmentThe Journal of Politics, 1981
- The Electoral Cycle and Patterns of American PoliticsBritish Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Institutionalization of Voting Patterns, or is Mobilization the Source of Decay?American Political Science Review, 1975