Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 27 (11) , 2509-2513
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.11.2509-2513.1989
Abstract
The ATB 32A system (API System SA, La Balme les Grottes, Montalieu-Vercieu, France) was evaluated for use in the identification of 214 anaerobes. Organisms included 73 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group, 24 Bacteroides spp., 10 fusobacteria, 43 clostridia, 28 cocci, and 36 gram-positive, nonsporeforming rods. With the concomitant use of Gram stain, pigmentation, catalase testing, and aerobic growth, the ATB 32A system correctly identified 97% of the B. fragilis group isolates, 88% of Bacteroides spp., 50% of fusobacteria, 74% of clostridia, 100% of cocci, and 86% of the gram-positive, nonsporeforming rods. Overall, 188 strains (88%) were correctly identified, with 18 (8%) requiring extra tests, other than the four mentioned above, for correct identification. Eight strains were misidentified, including one Bacteroides sp., three fusobacteria, one Clostridium sp., and three gram-positive, nonsporeforming rods. Reproducibility was very good, with 12 of 14 strains (86%) tested in triplicate yielding identical correct results on each of three occasions and 2 strains (14%) yielding identical correct results on two occasions. There was a low-probability identification (including the correct species) on the third testing. The ATB 32A system represents a worthwhile advance in systems used for the identification of clinically significant anaerobic bacteria.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20A for identification of anaerobic bacteriaEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Comparison of RapID-ANA and minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1987
- Comparison of Minitek Anaerobe II®, API An-Ident®, and RapID ANA® Systems for Identification of Clostridium difficileAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1986
- Comparison of two systems for identification of anaerobic bacteriaEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1985
- Anaerobic Identification SystemsClinics In Laboratory Medicine, 1985
- Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM systemEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1984
- EVALUATION OF MINITEC AND API AS RAPID DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA1984
- Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identificationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1983
- Evaluation of the API ZYM system for identification ofBacteroides andFusobacterium speciesMedical Microbiology and Immunology, 1980
- Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteriaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1975