Establishment of a particle-counting method for purified elementary bodies of chlamydiae and evaluation of sensitivities of the IDEIA Chlamydia kit and DNA probe by using the purified elementary bodies
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 30 (11) , 2911-6
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.11.2911-2916.1992
Abstract
To evaluate the sensitivity of commercially available test kits for detection of chlamydiae, we established a method of purifying Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae elementary bodies (EBs). We then subjected the purified EBs, together with the purified EBs of Chlamydia psittaci, to the IDEIA Chlamydia (IDEIA) and DNA probe test kits to determine the EB numbers at the detection limits. The sensitivities of the test kits were thus compared. The results can be summarized as follows. (i) Intact EBs in the purified preparations were present at 100, 96.3, and 97% for the C. psittaci Cal 10, C. trachomatis L2/434/Bu (L2), and C. pneumoniae TW-183 strains, respectively. The preparations of the L2 and TW-183 EBs contained a few EB envelopes, which reacted with antilipopolysaccharide monoclonal antibodies, as did the intact EBs, indicating that elimination of EB envelopes is not required for testing of the IDEIA kit's sensitivity. (ii) We established a method of counting intact EBs and EB envelopes under a scanning electron microscope after sedimentation of EBs on a coverslip by centrifugation. (iii) The EB numbers per assay at the cutoff level, which is set up in the IDEIA kit, were 9.6 x 10(2), 6.5 x 10(3), and 2.5 x 10(4) for the L2, TW-183, and Cal 10 strains, respectively. When the same EB preparations were applied to the DNA probe kit, the EB number at the cutoff level was 7.5 x 10(3) per assay for the L2 strain, but no reaction occurred for the Cal 10 and TW-183 strains at any EB number, indicating that the DNA probe kit is highly specific for C. trachomatis. Although the IDEIA kit designed for detection of C. trachomatis showed a sensitivity superior to that of the DNA probe, the chlamydial species was not determined by the IDEIA kit.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genital chlamydial infections: Epidemiology and reproductive sequelaeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Evaluation of three Chlamydia trachomatis immunoassays with an unbiased, noninvasive clinical sampleJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1990
- Current knowledge onChlamydia pneumoniae, strain TWAR, an important cause of pneumonia and other acute respiratory diseasesEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1989
- A NewChlamydia psittaciStrain, TWAR, Isolated in Acute Respiratory Tract InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1985
- The Genus-Specific Antigen of Chlamydia : Resemblance to the Lipopolysaccharide of Enteric BacteriaScience, 1983
- Monoclonal antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis: antibody specificities and antigen characterization.The Journal of Immunology, 1982
- Primary Isolation of TRIC Organisms in HeLa 229 Cells Treated with DEAE-DextranThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1972
- RNA synthesis in cells infected with the meningopneumonitis agentJournal of Molecular Biology, 1965
- Purification and chemical composition of meningopneumonitis virusVirology, 1963