Randomised trial of a decision aid and its timing for women being tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation
Open Access
- 20 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 90 (2) , 333-342
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601525
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a decision aid (DA) and its timing in women being tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation. Women with and without a previous history of cancer were included after blood sampling for genetic testing. The DA consisted of a brochure and video providing information on screening and prophylactic surgery. To evaluate the impact of the DA, women were randomised to the DA group (n=184), receiving the DA 2 weeks after blood sampling, or to the control group (n=184). To evaluate the impact of timing, mutation carriers who had received the DA before the test result (n=47) were compared to mutation carriers who received the DA after the test result (n=42). Data were collected on well-being, treatment choice, decision and information related outcomes. The impact of the DA was measured 4 weeks after blood sampling. The impact of timing was measured 2 weeks after a positive test result. The DA had no impact on well-being. Regarding decision related outcomes, the DA group more frequently considered prophylactic surgery (P=0.02) corroborated with higher valuations (P=0.04). No differences were found for the other decision related outcomes. Regarding information related outcomes, the DA group felt better informed (P=0.00), was more satisfied with the information (P=0.00), and showed more accurate risk perceptions. Timing of the DA had no effect on any of the outcomes. No interactions were found between the DA and history of cancer. In conclusion, women being tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation benefit from the DA on information related outcomes. Because timing had no effect, the DA is considered useful either before or after the test result.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of BRCA1/2 testing and disclosure of a positive test result on women affected and unaffected with breast or ovarian cancerAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2003
- Attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancerJournal of Medical Genetics, 2000
- Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000
- The Risk of Cancer Associated with Specific Mutations ofBRCA1andBRCA2among Ashkenazi JewsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Psychological distress in applicants for predictive DNA testing for autosomal dominant, heritable, late onset disorders. The Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Workgroup.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: Preliminary findings.Health Psychology, 1997
- What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2Nature, 1995
- Unusual case of Smith‐Lemli‐Opitz syndrome “type II”American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1995
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977