aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis
- 24 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 31 (5) , 473-478
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2721
Abstract
Objective To describe the diagnostic performance of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in the presence of mosaicism in the fetoplacental unit using direct chorionic villi. Method In an ongoing study on the diagnostic performance of aCGH in 80 high-risk pregnancies, we studied three cases of placental mosaicism by carrying out aCGH on DNA of direct chorionic villi and chorionic villi cultures. Results Case 1: A three- to fourfold dosage gain of the region 18p in aCGH on direct villi was due to two additional isochromosomes 18p confined to the cytotrophoblast. Case 2: aCGH on direct villi revealed a normal result, whereas trisomy 18 mosaicism was present in cultured cells. Case 3: aCGH identifies monosomy X and mosaic disomy of the region Xp11.21-Xq12, whereas this mosaic cell line is not present in the conventional chromosome preparation on the cytotrophoblast. Conclusion Although interpretation of aCGH results may be straightforward in the majority of cases, placental mosaicism may cause misinterpretations of rapid aCGH results on direct chorionic villi due to discrepant chromosomal constitutions of cytotrophoblast and mesenchymal villus core. Further investigations including cultures, fluorescence in situ hybridization and possible amniocentesis will still be required for interpretation of results. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
Funding Information
- Perkin Elmer, Turku, Finland
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Whole‐genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarrayPrenatal Diagnosis, 2009
- Impact of a new national screening policy for Down's syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort studyBMJ, 2008
- High‐resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosisPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGHPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- Microarray‐based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogeneticsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2007
- Detection of low‐level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimensAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2006
- European collaborative research on mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC)—fetal and extrafetal cell lineages in 192 gestations with CVS mosaicism involving single autosomal trisomyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- Confined placental mosaicism.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1996
- Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal developmentPlacenta, 1994
- ‘False-negative’ and ‘false-positive’ prenatal cytogenetic results due to ‘true’ mosaicismPrenatal Diagnosis, 1991