Competing Theories of Financial Anomalies
Top Cited Papers
- 2 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 15 (2) , 575-606
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.2.575
Abstract
We compare two competing theories of financial anomalies: “behavioral” theories built on investor irrationality, and “rational structural uncertainty” theories built on incomplete information about the structure of the economic environment. We find that although the theories relax opposite assumptions of the rational expectations ideal, their mathematical and predictive similarities make them difficult to distinguish. Even if irrationality generates financial anomalies, their disappearance still may hinge on rational learning—that is, on the ability of rational arbitrageurs and their investors to reject competing rational explanations for observed price patterns.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investmentsPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Estimating the Market Risk PremiumSSRN Electronic Journal, 1999
- Irrational ExpectationsLegal Theory, 1997
- Towards a Consensus on OverconfidenceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Overconfidence in Probability and Frequency Judgments: A Critical ExaminationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral StrategiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- On the structure and diversity of rational beliefsEconomic Theory, 1994
- How Learning in Financial Markets Generates Excess Volatility and Predictability in Stock PricesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993
- Learning Rational Expectations: Classical Conditions Ensure Uniqueness and Global StabilityEconomica, 1990
- Experiments in the laboratory and the real worldOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973