The Volume-Outcome Effect for Abdominal Aortic Surgery
Open Access
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 137 (7) , 828-832
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.7.828
Abstract
HOSPITALS THAT perform high volumes (HVHs) of complex vascular surgery have superior outcomes to those that perform low volumes (LVHs).1-6 Two recent population-based studies estimated that regionalization of high-risk surgery, including some complex vascular procedures, could potentially save thousands of lives each year in the United States.6,7 The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome is likely a complex interaction involving differences in preoperative patient selection, technological resources, surgeon and anesthesiologist experience, postoperative management, and other processes of care.8-10 By identifying the factors that explain the volume-outcome relationship, we can focus quality improvement efforts on these factors and reduce mortality at LVHs without disrupting access to care.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiativeSurgery, 2001
- Selective Referral to High-Volume Hospitals: Estimating Potentially Avoidable DeathsSurvey of Anesthesiology, 2001
- Variations in complication rates and opportunities for improvement in quality of care for patients having abdominal aortic surgeryLangenbecks Archives Of Surgery, 2001
- Results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: A population-based analysis of 2335 casesJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1999
- The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical proceduresJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1999
- Organizational Characteristics of Intensive Care Units Related to Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic SurgeryJAMA, 1999
- Variation in Carotid Endarterectomy Mortality in the Medicare PopulationJAMA, 1998
- Costs of Potential Complications of Care for Major Surgery PatientsAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 1995
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993