The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up
Open Access
- 5 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 3 (2) , 99-108
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0086-1
Abstract
Increasing numbers of people survive cancer beyond diagnosis and treatment. Many survivors have ongoing needs and they may encounter fragmented, poorly coordinated follow up care. Survivorship care plans (SCP) have been promoted as a key aspect of survivorship care. This study aimed to survey key stakeholders in the care of people with colorectal cancer (survivors, primary care providers and hospital-based healthcare professionals) regarding follow-up and SCP. In study 1, cancer survivors completed a questionnaire regarding their follow-up and experiences during survivorship. Participants’ primary care physicians completed a phone interview regarding proposed SCP elements. A subgroup of survivors reviewed a sample SCP and participated in a phone interview regarding this. In study 2, healthcare professionals working with colorectal cancer patients completed a questionnaire regarding follow-up and proposed elements of a SCP. Twenty survivors completed the questionnaire, 14 primary care providers completed a phone interview and 12 survivors reviewed the sample SCP. Ninety-five healthcare professionals (30 medical professionals and 65 nurses) completed the questionnaire. There was strong support for core elements of the SCP. Additionally, nurses and survivors expressed support for supportive care and psychosocial elements. There was lack of consensus regarding who should prepare and discuss the SCP. There is strong support for the development and use of SCPs for bowel cancer survivors. There is some variation in opinion regarding ideal content of the SCP, who might prepare it, and how it might be discussed and utilised. Overcoming identified barriers to implementing SCPs for bowel cancer survivors is necessary for high quality cancer care.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current and Future Utilization of Services From Medical OncologistsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Tailored Chemotherapy Information Faxed to General Practitioners Improves Confidence in Managing Adverse Effects and Satisfaction With Shared Care: Results From a Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Implementing a Survivorship Care Plan for Patients With Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients.2007
- Perspectives on Post-Treatment Cancer Care: Qualitative Research With Survivors, Nurses, and PhysiciansJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Future Supply and Demand for Oncologists : Challenges to Assuring Access to Oncology ServicesJournal of Oncology Practice, 2007
- Models for Delivering Survivorship CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Colon Cancer SurveillanceJournal of Oncology Practice, 2005