Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a “trial effect”
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 54 (3) , 217-224
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00305-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Randomized Control Trial Outcomes Influenced by the Inclusion of a Placebo Group?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Characteristics and mortality outcomes of thrombolysis trial participants and nonparticipants: A population-based comparisonJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Survival from acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia, 1971-88: a population based study.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1994
- Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- Comparison of eligible randomized patients with two groups of ineligible patients: Can the results of the VA total parenteral nutrition clinical trial be generalized?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Epidemiologic analyses of causation: the unlearned scientific lessons of randomized trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- THE VALUE OF PARTICIPATING IN AN ASTHMA TRIALThe Lancet, 1985
- Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery: Comparability of entry characteristics and survival in randomized patients and nonrandomized patients meeting randomization criteriaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- Nephroblastoma: treatment during 1970-3 and the effect on survival of inclusion in the first MRC trial.BMJ, 1979
- Duration of Survival of Children with Acute Leukaemia: REPORT TO THE MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEUKAEMIA AND THE WORKING PARTY ON LEUKAEMIA IN CHILDHOODBMJ, 1971