Isone Watchdog Better Than Three? International Experience with Integrated Financial Sector Supervision
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by International Monetary Fund (IMF) in IMF Working Papers
- Vol. 6 (57)
- https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451863178.001
Abstract
Over the past two decades, there has been a clear trend toward integrating the regulation and supervision of banks, nonbank financial institutions, and securities markets. This paper reviews the international experience with integrated supervision. We survey the theoretical arguments for and against the integrated supervisory model, and use data on compliance with international standards to assess the validity of some of these arguments. We find that (i) full integration is associated with higher quality of supervision in insurance and securities and greater consistency of supervision across sectors, after controlling for the level of development; and (ii) fully integrated supervision is not associated with a significant reduction in supervisory staff.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allocating bank regulatory powers: Lender of last resort, deposit insurance and supervisionEuropean Economic Review, 2005
- Does Regulatory Governance Matter for Financial System Stability? An Empirical AnalysisIMF Working Papers, 2004
- Does Compliance with Basel Core Principles Bring Any Measurable Benefits?IMF Working Papers, 2004
- Bank Consolidation, Internationalization and Conglomeration: Trends and Implications for Financial RiskIMF Working Papers, 2003
- Cross-Sector Supervision: Which Model?Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2003
- Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomicsWorking Paper Series, 2002
- Issues in the Unification of Financial Sector SupervisionIMF Working Papers, 2000
- Institutional Separation between Supervisory and Monetary Agencies (1993)Published by Springer Nature ,1995