Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Accuracy of Measuring Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Malaria from Household Surveys in Zambia
Open Access
- 7 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 10 (5) , e1001417
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001417
Abstract
Background To assess progress in the scale-up of rapid diagnostic tests and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) across Africa, malaria control programs have increasingly relied on standardized national household surveys to determine the proportion of children with a fever in the past 2 wk who received an effective antimalarial within 1–2 d of the onset of fever. Here, the validity of caregiver recall for measuring the primary coverage indicators for malaria diagnosis and treatment of children <5 y old is assessed. Methods and Findings A cross-sectional study was conducted in five public clinics in Kaoma District, Western Provence, Zambia, to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of caregivers' recall of malaria testing, diagnosis, and treatment, compared to a gold standard of direct observation at the health clinics. Compared to the gold standard of clinic observation, for recall for children with fever in the past 2 wk, the sensitivity for recalling that a finger/heel stick was done was 61.9%, with a specificity of 90.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of caregivers' recalling a positive malaria test result were 62.4% and 90.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of recalling that the child was given a malaria diagnosis, irrespective of whether a laboratory test was actually done, were 76.8% and 75.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for recalling that an ACT was given were 81.0% and 91.5%, respectively. Conclusions Based on these findings, results from household surveys should continue to be used for ascertaining the coverage of children with a fever in the past 2 wk that received an ACT. However, as recall of a malaria diagnosis remains suboptimal, its use in defining malaria treatment coverage is not recommended. Please see later in the article for the Editors' SummaryKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Testing the Validity of Women's Self-Report of Key Maternal and Newborn Health Interventions during the Peripartum Period in MozambiquePLOS ONE, 2013
- Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Tracking Progress in Health for Women and Children Using DHS and MICS Household SurveysPLoS Medicine, 2013
- Got ACTs? Availability, price, market share and provider knowledge of anti-malarial medicines in public and private sector outlets in six malaria-endemic countriesMalaria Journal, 2011
- Net Benefits: A Multicountry Analysis of Observational Data Examining Associations between Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets and Health OutcomesPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Validating child vaccination status in a demographic surveillance system using data from a clinical cohort study: evidence from rural South AfricaBMC Public Health, 2011
- Protective efficacy of malaria case management and intermittent preventive treatment for preventing malaria mortality in children: a systematic review for the Lives Saved ToolBMC Public Health, 2011
- Scaling Up Malaria Control in Zambia: Progress and Impact 2005–2008The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2010
- Evaluation of the optimal recall period for disease symptoms in home-based morbidity surveillance in rural and urban KenyaInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- From chloroquine to artemether-lumefantrine: the process of drug policy change in ZambiaMalaria Journal, 2008
- Answering Autobiographical Questions: The Impact of Memory and Inference on SurveysScience, 1987