Convergence And Dissonance: Evolution In Private-Sector Approaches To Disease Management And Care Coordination
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 26 (6) , 1683-1691
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1683
Abstract
Disease management (DM) approaches survived the 1990s backlash against managed care because of their potential for consumer-friendly cost containment, but purchasers have been cautious about investing heavily in them because of uncertainty about return on investment. This study examines how private-sector approaches to DM have evolved over the past two years in the midst of the movement toward consumer-driven health care. Findings indicate that these programs have become standard features of health plan design, despite a thin evidence base concerning their effectiveness. Uncertainties remain regarding how well these programs will function within benefit designs that require higher consumer cost sharing.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value-Based Insurance DesignHealth Affairs, 2007
- Physician Practice Size And Variations In Treatments And Outcomes: Evidence From Medicare Patients With AMIHealth Affairs, 2007
- Consumer-Directed Health Insurance Products: Local-Market PerspectivesHealth Affairs, 2006
- A Review and Analysis of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Comprehensive Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs at the Worksite: Update VI 2000???2004Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2005
- The Costs of Obesity among Full-Time EmployeesAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 2005
- Managed Care Rebound? Recent Changes In Health Plans' Cost Containment StrategiesHealth Affairs, 2004
- Out-of-Pocket Costs and Diabetes Preventive ServicesDiabetes Care, 2003
- Renewed Emphasis On Consumer Cost Sharing In Health Insurance Benefit DesignHealth Affairs, 2002
- The Death of Managed Care as We Know ItJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1999