Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program
Open Access
- 18 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 172 (2) , 195-199
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040485
Abstract
In the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program (Programme quebecois de depistage du cancer du sein [PQDCS]), radiologists' and facilities' volumes of screening mammography vary considerably. We examined the relation of screening-mammography volume to rates of breast cancer detection and false-positive readings in the PQDCS.The study population included 307,314 asymptomatic women aged 50-69 years screened during 1998-2000. Breast cancer detection rates were analyzed by comparing all women with screening-detected breast cancer (n = 1709) and a 10% random sample of those without (n = 30,560). False-positive rates were analyzed by comparing the 3159 women with false-positive readings and the 27,401 others in the 10% random sample. Characteristics of participants, radiologists and facilities were obtained from the PQDCS information system. Data were analyzed by means of logistic regression.The rate of breast cancer detection appeared to be unrelated to the radiologist's screening-mammography volume but increased with the facility's screening-mammography volume. The breast cancer detection rate ratio for facilities performing 4000 or more screenings per year, compared with those performing fewer than 2000, was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.52). In contrast, the frequency of false-positive readings was unrelated to the facility's screening volume but was inversely related to the radiologist's screening volume: the rate ratio for readers of 1500 or more screenings per year compared with those reading fewer than 250 was 0.53 (95% CI 0.35-0.79).Radiologists' and facilities' caseloads showed independent and complementary associations with performance of screening mammography in the PQDCS. Radiologists who worked in larger facilities and read more screening mammograms had higher breast cancer detection rates while maintaining lower false-positive rates.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Improving the Accuracy of Mammography: Volume and Outcome RelationshipsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Does individual programme size affect screening performance? Results from the United Kingdom NHS breast screening programmeJournal of Medical Screening, 2002
- Association of Recall Rates with Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Values of Screening MammographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Standardized Abnormal Interpretation and Cancer Detection Ratios to Assess Reading Volume and Reader Performance in a Breast Screening ProgramRadiology, 2000
- Assessing mammographers' accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Multilevel Analysis in Public Health ResearchAnnual Review of Public Health, 2000
- Review of Organizational Factors Related to Care Offered to Woman with Brest CancerEpidemiologic Reviews, 2000
- Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologistsJournal of Medical Screening, 1999