Must Instructionally Useful Performance Assessment Be Based in the Curriculum?
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 61 (1) , 15-24
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299406100103
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the importance of the most salient feature of a performance-assessment approach known as curriculum-based assessment: that testing material be drawn from the students' instructional curricula. First, we review the literature on (a) the match between tests and curricula and (b) comparisons of measurement validity and instructional utility when sampling student performance in and out of the instructional curriculum. Second, we discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of sampling performance in the curriculum. After concluding that sampling from the curriculum is not essential, we discuss three critical features to ensure the instructional utility of measurement.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Curriculum within Curriculum-Based MeasurementExceptional Children, 1991
- Paradigmatic Distinctions between Instructionally Relevant Measurement ModelsExceptional Children, 1991
- An Analysis of Spelling Curricula and Teachers' Skills in Identifying Error TypesRemedial and Special Education, 1990
- Monitoring Reading Growth Using Student Recalls: Effects of Two Teacher Feedback SystemsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1989
- Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Meta-AnalysisExceptional Children, 1986
- Using Curriculum-Based Assessment Data to Make Instructional DecisionsExceptional Children, 1985
- Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging AlternativeExceptional Children, 1985
- THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT STYLES OF TEXTBOOK USE ON INSTRUCTIONAL VALIDITY OF STANDARDIZED TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1983
- Reliability and Validity of Curriculum-Based Informal Reading InventoriesReading Research Quarterly, 1982
- Reliability of the Fry Sampling ProcedureReading Research Quarterly, 1980