Neuropsychological testimony: Some emerging concerns
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- professional issues
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Vol. 2 (1) , 89-100
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13854048808520089
Abstract
Recent court decisions may have a profound impact on the ways in which neuropsychological opinions are presented in court. Three such cases are described, with emphasis on a recent ruling establishing the competence of neuropsychological testimony but vesting judgement of the credibility of the testimony with the court. Psychologists seeking to offer neuropsychological opinion are charged to adhere to recognized standards and definitions in representing their skills to the courts and society at large.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Limitations on neuropsychological testimony by the florida appellate decisions: Action, reaction, and counteractionThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1987
- Reports of the ins - division 40 task force on education, accreditation, and credentialingThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1987
- Continuing education: An alternative to respecialization in clinical neuropsychologyThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1987
- Legal principles governing expert testimony by experimental psychologists.Law and Human Behavior, 1986
- Census of psychological personnel: 1983.American Psychologist, 1985