Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0‐Tesla MR system
Open Access
- 25 November 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 16 (6) , 721-732
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10207
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate magnetic field interactions for 109 different biomedical implants and devices in association with exposure to a 3.0‐Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) system. Materials and Methods A total of 109 implants and devices (aneurysm clips, 32; clips, fasteners, and staples, 10; coils and stents, 10; heart valve prostheses and annuloplasty rings, 12; orthopedic implants, five; suture materials, 13; vascular access ports and accessories, 13; miscellaneous implants and devices, 14) were tested for magnetic field interactions at 3.0‐Tesla using previously‐described, standardized techniques to assess magnetic field translational attraction and torque. Results The deflection angles and torque measurements ranged, respectively, from 0 to 16° and 0 to +2 for the aneurysm clips; 0 to 90° and 0 to +4 for the clips, fasteners, and staples; 0 to 47° and 0 to +4 for the coils and stents; 0 to 4° and 0 to +1 for the heart valve prostheses and annuloplasty rings; 0 to 12° and 0 to +2 for the orthopedic implants; 0 to 13° and 0 to +2 for the suture materials; 0 to 52° and 0 to +4 for the vascular access ports and accessories; and 0 to 28° and 0 to +3 for the miscellaneous implants and devices. Conclusion Of the 109 implants and devices assessed for magnetic field interactions at 3.0‐Tesla, four (4%) are potentially unsafe based on deflection angle criteria. The implications of these results for patients undergoing MR procedures at 3.0‐Tesla is discussed. Notably, these results are specific to the 3.0‐Tesla MR system used for this evaluation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:721–732.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic resonance safety testing of a newly‐developed fiber‐optic cardiac pacing leadJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2002
- Metallic marking clips used after stereotactic breast biopsy: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1999
- Heating near implanted medical devices by the MRI RF-magnetic fieldIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1999
- MR imaging and cervical fixation devices: Evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 teslaMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996
- Hr imaging and vascular access ports: Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 tJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1995
- MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Assessment of ferromagnetism and artifactJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1992
- The Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Metal Spine ImplantsSpine, 1989
- High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forcesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988
- Magnetic field effects on surgical ligation clipsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1987
- Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implantsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981