Physical Activity Questionnaire Comprehension
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 41 (2) , 336-343
- https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318186b1b1
Abstract
To determine whether respondents share researchers' understandings of concepts and questions frequently used in the assessment of usual physical activity (PA) behavior. As part of On the Move, a study aimed at reducing measurement error in self-reported physical activity (PA), we conducted cognitive interviews with 19 men and 21 women, ages 45-65, regarding their responses to the PA questionnaires used in two large, population-based studies, Life After Cancer Epidemiology and California Men's Health study. One questionnaire asks about the frequency, the duration, and the perceived intensity of a range of specific activities in several different domains over the past 12 months. The second questionnaire asks about frequency and duration of specific, mostly recreational activities, grouped by intensity (i.e., moderate or vigorous) over the past 3 months. We used verbal probing techniques to allow respondents to describe their thought processes as they completed the questionnaires. All interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were then analyzed using standard qualitative methods. Cognitive interviews demonstrated that a sizable number of respondents understood "intensity" in terms of emotional or psychological intensity rather than physical effort. As a result, the perceived intensity with which a participant reported doing a specific activity often bore little relationship to the MET value of that activity. Additionally, participants often counted the same activity more than once, overestimated work-related PA, and understood activities that were grouped together in a single category to be definitive lists rather than examples. Cognitive interviews revealed significant gaps between respondents' interpretations of some PA questions and researchers' assumptions about what those questions were intended to measure. Some sources of measurement error in self-reported PA may be minimized by additional research that focuses on the cognitive processes required to respond to PA questionnaires.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cultural Variability in the Effects of Question Design Features on Respondent Comprehension of Health SurveysAnnals of Epidemiology, 2006
- Physical activity and stroke. A meta-analysis of observational dataInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Physical Activity and Cancer Prevention???Data from Epidemiologic StudiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003
- Assessment of Physical Activity with a Single Global Question in a Large, Multiethnic Sample of Midlife WomenAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Ability of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC)/Baecke Questionnaire to Assess Leisure-Time Physical ActivityInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Ability of the Caltrac Accelerometer to Assess Daily Physical Activity LevelsJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1995
- Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in womenThe Lancet, 1991
- The validity of single-item, self-assessment questions as measures of adult physical activityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- Validity and Reliability of Short Physical Activity HistoryJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1989
- Physical Activity and the Incidence of Coronary Heart DiseaseAnnual Review of Public Health, 1987