Bias in occupational epidemiology studies
Top Cited Papers
- 19 October 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 64 (8) , 562-568
- https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.026690
Abstract
The design of occupational epidemiology studies should be based on the need to minimise random and systematic error. The latter is the focus of this paper, and includes selection bias, information bias and confounding. Selection bias can be minimised by obtaining a high response rate (and by appropriate selection of the control group in a case-control study). In general, it is important to ensure that information bias is minimised and is also non-differential (for example, that the misclassification of exposure is not related to disease status) by collecting data in a standardised manner. A major concern in occupational epidemiology studies usually relates to confounding, because exposure has not been randomly allocated, and the groups under study may therefore have different baseline disease risks. For each of these types of bias, the goal should be to avoid the bias by appropriate study design and/or appropriate control in the analysis. However, it is also important to attempt to assess the likely direction and strength of biases that cannot be avoided or controlled.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative evaluation of the effects of uncontrolled confounding by alcohol and tobacco in occupational cancer studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Healthy Worker Effect in a Longitudinal Study of One-Second Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) and Chronic Exposure to Granite DustInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Correlated Nondifferential Misclassifications of Disease and Exposure: Application to a Cross-Sectional Study of the Relation between Handedness and Immune DisordersInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Bias from Nondifferential but Dependent Misclassification of Exposure and OutcomeEpidemiology, 1992
- Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect EffectsEpidemiology, 1992
- Aspects of misclassification of confounding factorsAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1992
- Confounding from smoking in occupational epidemiology.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1989
- Smoking and degree of occupational exposure: Are internal analyses in cohort studies likely to be confounded by smoking status?American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1988
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effectMathematical Modelling, 1986
- Pertinency of an extraneous variableJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1967