Bankruptcy Priority for Bank Deposits: A Contract Theoretic Explanation
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 13 (3) , 813-840
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13.3.813
Abstract
Over the past decade several countries, including the US, have introduced or redesigned legislation that confers priority in bankruptcy upon all or some bank deposits. We argue that in the presence of contracting costs such rules can increase efficiency. We first show in a private information model that a borrower can reduce overall costs of finance by letting informationally heterogeneous lenders choose between junior and senior debt. In particular, we find that debt priorities reduce socially wasteful information gathering by investors. We then argue why, particularly in banking, legal standardization of debt priorities may be superior to bilateral private arrangements.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Building an incentive-compatible safety netJournal of Banking & Finance, 1999
- Judging the Risk of Banks: Why Can't Bond Raters Agree?SSRN Electronic Journal, 1999
- The Cost of Debt for a Financial FirmSSRN Electronic Journal, 1998
- Households' Deposit Insurance Coverage: Evidence and Analysis of Potential ReformsJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1996
- The Priority Structure of Corporate LiabilitiesThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Debt and Seniority: An Analysis of the Role of Hard Claims in Constraining ManagementPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1994
- Seniority and maturity of debt contractsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Design of Bank Loan Contracts, Collateral, and RenegotiationPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1993
- What's different about banks?Journal of Monetary Economics, 1985
- On Freedom of ExpressionThe Yale Law Journal, 1979