A comparison of anaesthetic breathing systems during spontaneous ventilation
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 44 (3) , 194-199
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11221.x
Abstract
Five anaesthetic breathing systems (Magill, Lack, Humphrey ADE, enclosed Magill and Bain) were compared using spontaneous ventilation in a simple lung model. The fresh gas flow at which rebreathing occurred was determined for each system by the application of four modified definitions of rebreathing. Two were based on the measurement of minimum inspired and two on end-expired carbon dioxide. The four A systems performed similarly with each individual definition. The rebreathing points found for each individual breathing system differed markedly between definitions, with those determined by the minimum inspired CO2 occurring at low, and probably misleading, FGF/VE ratio. The Bain system demonstrated rebreathing at considerably higher fresh gas flows whichever definition was used.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. low flow universal anaesthetic breathing systemCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1986
- An assessment of the Humphrey ADE anaesthetic system in the Mapleson A mode during spontaneous ventilationAnaesthesia, 1984
- A new anaesthetic breathing system combining Mapleson A, D and E principlesAnaesthesia, 1983
- The Lack anaesthetic systemAnaesthesia, 1980
- The Lack anaesthetic system.Anaesthesia, 1980
- A comparison between the bain and magill anaesthetic systems during spontaneous breathingCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1978
- The Lack anaesthetic system An assessment during spontaneous ventilationAnaesthesia, 1976
- Theatre pollution controlAnaesthesia, 1976
- Fresh Gas Original Investigations of the Magill CircuitAnesthesiology, 1968
- Rebreathing with the Magill attachmentAnaesthesia, 1968