Orienting Task Specificity in Incidental Motor Learning
- 1 June 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 11 (2) , 135-140
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1979.10735181
Abstract
The manipulation of the retention of a linear movement by means of different orienting tasks in an incidental learning paradigm was investigated. Subjects were presented with a target position followed by a different nontarget position on each of four presentation trials. After the presentation trials subjects were required to recall the target and nontarget positions. One group made verbal estimates of the distance between the target and nontarget positions, another group discriminated between the target and nontarget positions, while no verbal responses were required for a third group. The verbal-response groups, while not differing from each other, had less error at recall than the nonverbalizing group. These findings were discussed in terms of the levels of processing framework for memory research (Craik & Lockhart, 1972).This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Levels of processing: A critiqueBritish Journal of Psychology, 1978
- The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research.Psychological Review, 1978
- Levels of processing: A reply to EysenckBritish Journal of Psychology, 1978
- Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975
- Variable and Constant Performance Errors Within a Group of IndividualsJournal of Motor Behavior, 1974
- Retention characteristics of different reproduction cues in motor short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Levels of processing: A framework for memory researchJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972
- Decay and interference effects in the short-term retention of a discrete motor act.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970