Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions for coercion during mental hospital admission
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 11 (3) , 307-321
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370110308
Abstract
Legal and extra‐legal coercion are pervasive in mental hospital admission and there are sharp disputes about its appropriate role. This article presents two scales for measuring psychiatric patients' perceptions of coercion during hospital admission and reports data on these scales' internal consistency. We measure patients' perceptions of coercion by asking questions, in either an interview or questionnaire format, about their experience of lack of control, choice, influence, and freedom in hospital admission. Patients' responses to questions about their perceptions of coercion were highly internally consistent. The internal consistency of the scale was robust with respect to variation in site, instrument format, patient population, and interview procedure. Correspondence analysis was used to construct two numerical scales of perceived coercion.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inclusion, motivation, and good faith: The morality of coercion in mental hospital admissionBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1993
- Patient, family, and staff perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission: An exploratory studyBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1993
- Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable NonresponseJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protectAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1985
- Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.American Psychologist, 1983
- A commitment law for patients, doctors, and lawyersAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1979