A commitment law for patients, doctors, and lawyers
- 1 September 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in American Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 136 (9) , 1121-1127
- https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.136.9.1121
Abstract
The author proposes a model commitment law that balances the sometimes conflicting points of view among patients, doctors, and lawyers about this subject. Paternalism is affirmed, while safeguards are provided. It is argued that absent patient incompetency to consent to or refuse treatment, or absent an emergency, mental patients should not be treated involuntarily. The author believes that a different procedural approach is required depending on whether the patient is committed under the parens patriae or police power of the state.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHO ARE THE “COMMITTED”?Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1977
- A Comparison of Voluntary and Committed Psychiatric PatientsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1977
- Position Statement on the Right to Adequate Care and Treatment for the Mentally Ill and Mentally RetardedAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1977
- Tests of competency to consent to treatmentAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1977
- Reliability of Psychiatric DiagnosisArchives of General Psychiatry, 1977
- A comparison of voluntary and involuntary patients in a state hospital.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Developments in the Law: Civil Commitment of the Mentally IllHarvard Law Review, 1974
- Involuntary Hospitalization: What For and How Long?American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974