Functions and Goal Directedness
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 59 (4) , 635-654
- https://doi.org/10.1086/289699
Abstract
We examine two approaches to functions: etiological and forward-looking. In the context of functions, we raise the question, familiar to philosophers of mind, about the explanatory role of properties that arenotsupervenient on the mere dispositional features of a system. We first argue that the question has no easy answer in either of the two approaches. We then draw a parallel between functions and goal directedness. We conclude by proposing an answer to the question: The explanatory importance of nonsupervenient properties (like having the function of doing something, or like being goal-directed) does not lie in any special causal mechanism through which these properties bring about their effects; it lies rather in the different classification of the explananda types that these properties generate.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Defense of Proper FunctionsPhilosophy of Science, 1989
- Not Quite By AccidentDialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 1988
- FunctionsThe Journal of Philosophy, 1987
- FEEDBACK ABOUT FEEDBACK: REPLY TO EHRINGThe Southern Journal of Philosophy, 1986
- Operant Conditioning and a Paradox of TeleologyPhilosophy of Science, 1985
- Operant Conditioning and TeleologyPhilosophy of Science, 1980
- Function Attributions and Functional ExplanationsPhilosophy of Science, 1979
- Explanation, Teleology, and Operant Behaviorism: A Study of the Experimental Analysis of Purposive BehaviorPhilosophy of Science, 1976
- Wright on FunctionsThe Philosophical Review, 1976
- Explanation and TeleologyPhilosophy of Science, 1972