Performance of high-throughput DNA quantification methods
Open Access
- 28 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Biotechnology
- Vol. 3 (1) , 20
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-3-20
Abstract
The accuracy and precision of estimates of DNA concentration are critical factors for efficient use of DNA samples in high-throughput genotype and sequence analyses. We evaluated the performance of spectrophotometric (OD) DNA quantification, and compared it to two fluorometric quantification methods, the PicoGreen® assay (PG), and a novel real-time quantitative genomic PCR assay (QG) specific to a region at the human BRCA1 locus. Twenty-Two lymphoblastoid cell line DNA samples with an initial concentration of ~350 ng/uL were diluted to 20 ng/uL. DNA concentration was estimated by OD and further diluted to 5 ng/uL. The concentrations of multiple aliquots of the final dilution were measured by the OD, QG and PG methods. The effects of manual and robotic laboratory sample handling procedures on the estimates of DNA concentration were assessed using variance components analyses. The OD method was the DNA quantification method most concordant with the reference sample among the three methods evaluated. A large fraction of the total variance for all three methods (36.0–95.7%) was explained by sample-to-sample variation, whereas the amount of variance attributable to sample handling was small (0.8–17.5%). Residual error (3.2–59.4%), corresponding to un-modelled factors, contributed a greater extent to the total variation than the sample handling procedures. The application of a specific DNA quantification method to a particular molecular genetic laboratory protocol must take into account the accuracy and precision of the specific method, as well as the requirements of the experimental workflow with respect to sample volumes and throughput. While OD was the most concordant and precise DNA quantification method in this study, the information provided by the quantitative PCR assay regarding the suitability of DNA samples for PCR may be an essential factor for some protocols, despite the decreased concordance and precision of this method.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Real-Time PCR Detection of Brucella abortus : a Comparative Study of SYBR Green I, 5′-Exonuclease, and Hybridization Probe AssaysApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003
- Unbiased Whole-Genome Amplification Directly From Clinical SamplesGenome Research, 2003
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Quantitation of Relative Expression of Genes Modulated by p53 Using SYBR® Green IPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Quantifying DNA concentrations using fluorometry: a comparison of fluorophores.2002
- DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studiesNature Reviews Genetics, 2002
- Multiplex, Quantitative, Real-Time PCR Assay for Cytomegalovirus and Human DNAJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplificationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- NIST Mixed Stain Studies #1 and #2: Interlaboratory Comparison of DNA Quantification Practice and Short Tandem Repeat Multiplex Performance with Multiple-Source SamplesJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2001
- A Quantitative Fluorescence-Based Microplate Assay for the Determination of Double-Stranded DNA Using SYBR Green I and a Standard Ultraviolet Transilluminator Gel Imaging SystemAnalytical Biochemistry, 1999
- Genomewide Transmission/Disequilibrium Testing—Consideration of the Genotypic Relative Risks at Disease LociAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1997