Does Anonymity Matter in Electronic Limit Order Markets?
- 28 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 20 (5) , 1707-1747
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm027
Abstract
We develop a model in which limit order traders possess volatility information. We show that in this case the size of the bid–ask spread is informative about future volatility. Moreover, if volatility information is in part private, we establish that (i) the size of the bid–ask spread and (ii) its informativeness about future volatility should change in the same direction when limit order traders' identifiers stop being disclosed. We test these predictions using data from the Paris Bourse. As expected, we find that the average quoted spread and its informativeness are significantly smaller when limit order traders' identifiers are concealed. These findings suggest that the limit order book is a channel for volatility information.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lifting the Veil: An Analysis of Pre‐trade Transparency at the NYSEThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- The Impact of Limit Order Anonymity on Liquidity: Evidence from Paris, Tokyo and KoreaSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidityJournal of Financial Economics, 2005
- The Informational Content of an Open Limit Order BookSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Limit Orders, Depth, and Volatility: Evidence from the Stock Exchange of Hong KongThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris BourseThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Chapter 49 Arch modelsPublished by Elsevier ,1994
- Trading Patterns and Prices in the Interbank Foreign Exchange MarketThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- What's special about the specialist?Journal of Financial Economics, 1992
- Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced varianceJournal of Financial Economics, 1991