Outcomes of Adoption: Measuring Evidence Uptake by Individuals and Organizations
- 20 August 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
- Vol. 1 (s1) , S41-S52
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04048.x
Abstract
The translation and diffusion of findings into health care validate the potential of evidence-based innovation to improve clinical practice and affirm the benefits of society's investment in advancing science. This article briefly reviews key concepts in the knowledge use process, considers theoretical implications for measuring outcomes and uptake of innovation, discusses issues to consider in planning for measurement of adoption, and provides an example of confronting those challenges from a project now in progress. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES AND TRANSLATION OUTCOMES: Four principal conceptual frameworks related to translational science, Lewin, Rogers, Havelock, and Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS), explicate a process that catalyzes new knowledge adoption and use by individuals and systems to solve problems. Each conceptual perspective suggests that translation is not complete until the extent and impact of use is examined and understood. Most perspectives support evaluation of impact of evidence-based practice using process measures that integrate clinician knowledge, actual performance of the practice, and patient/clinician outcomes. Based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) framework, additional measures might include changes in patterns of care and changes in policies, procedures, or protocols. CASE EXAMPLE: A description of process and outcome measures used in an in-progress quality improvement demonstration project, California Nursing Outcomes Coalition (CalNOC) Partners in Quality Translating Research into Practice to Reduce Patient Falls Project, is presented. IMPLICATION(S) FOR PRACTICE, RESEARCH, AND POLICY: Since the adoption of evidence-based innovation is a process that is often described along a continuum, investigators seeking to measure the impact of an evidence-based innovation must gather evidence that uptake of the innovation has occurred. The theoretical perspective and practical measurement issues of a given project will drive selection of process and outcome measures. Efforts to change practice in order to enhance evidence-based patient care must integrate monitoring and evaluation of specific target outcomes of adoption as the basis for validating the impact of the change.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Synergy between publication and promotion: comparing adoption of new evidence in Canada and the United StatesThe American Journal of Medicine, 2003
- How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers?The Milbank Quarterly, 2003
- Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke RehabilitationStroke, 2003
- Failure to Vaccinate Medicare InpatientsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual frameworkQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Nurse Staffing in California Hospitals 1998-2000: Findings from the California Nursing Outcome Coalition Database ProjectPolicy, politics & nursing practice, 2001
- Clinical guidelines: Using clinical guidelinesBMJ, 1999
- Better Care and Better OutcomesJAMA, 1998
- From research to practice: one organizational model for promoting research‐based practiceJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1996
- Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsPublished by Elsevier ,1993