A Study on the Clinical Equivalence and Patient Preference of Fluticasone Propionate 250 μg Twice Daily via the DiskusTM/AccuhalerTMInhaler or the DiskhalerTM* Inhaler in Adult Asthmatic Patients
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Asthma
- Vol. 35 (4) , 337-345
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02770909809075666
Abstract
The DiskusTM/AccuhalerTM inhaler (D/A) is a new multidose powder inhaler, designed to deliver all asthma drugs. This study was carried out to establish clinical equivalence between FP 250 μg twice daily (b.i.d.) via the D/A and FP 250 μg b.i.d. via the current powder inhaler, the Diskhaler (DH). Also, device handling and patient preference for both devices were determined. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Adult asthmatics (364, aged 18–79) requiring inhaled corticosteroids in a daily dosage of 400 μg up to and including 1000 μg and demonstrating a mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) calculated from the last 7 days of the run-in of less than 85% of the response after salbutamol, a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 between 50 and 90% of their predicted normal value, and an ability to correctly use both devices, were randomized to a 12-week treatment period. No statistically significant differences between the two devices were seen for mean morning PEFR (p = 0.76), mean evening PEFR (p = 0.88), median daytime and nighttime symptom score (p = 0.57 and p = 0.47), median percentage of rescue-free days and nights (p = 0.43 and p = 0.24), and clinic visit lung function. No differences in the safety profile of FP were seen. Patients found the D/A easier to use and easier with respect to assessing the number of doses remaining (both p < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of the patients expressed an overall preference for the D/A over the DH (p < 0.001). The results show that FP 250 μg b.i.d. via the D/A is clinically equivalent to delivery via the DH. Both treatments proved to be equally safe and were well tolerated. The D/A was easier to use and patients preferred the D/A over the DH.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of four different inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Thorax, 1995
- Comparison of DiskusTMInhaler, a New Multidose Powder Inhaler, with DiskhalerTMInhaler for the Delivery of Salmeterol to Asthmatic PatientsJournal of Asthma, 1995
- Pharmacology of fluticasone propionateRespiratory Medicine, 1994
- Evaluation of fluticasone propionate (500 μg day−1) administered either as dry powder via a Diskhaler® inhaler or pressurized inhaler and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (1000 μg day−1) administered by pressurized inhalerRespiratory Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in mild and moderate asthma.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1993
- Large volume plastic spacers in asthma.BMJ, 1992
- Inhaled corticosteroids: benefits and risks.Thorax, 1992
- Paradoxical Bronchospasm After Use of Inhalation Aerosols: A Review of the LiteratureJournal of Asthma, 1991
- Structure-activity relationships of topically active steroids: the selection of fluticasone propionateRespiratory Medicine, 1990
- The human pharmacology of fluticasone propionateRespiratory Medicine, 1990